Friday, June 01, 2007

Marathon post

Guess what? Multi post again! Take a deep breath and let’s go!

Where to begin... Oh, I have an idea. How about sports? (I’m sure most of you will skip ahead... however, this one is more of a trivia question, so maybe you might find it interesting.)

Here’s our order: Sports, movies, theater, politics, controversy, outrage. Intrigued? Read on!

Sports: Any regular reader of JMO is fully aware of my ire with the Red Sox front office regarding the continuous dismantling of the team and the frivolous trading of minor league prospects. Some may believe that my feelings are not warranted, or, at the very least, are a bit out of proportion. Alright, chew on this: There are only six teams in Major League Baseball that do not currently have a former Red Sox player on their roster. Nearly all of the remaining 24 teams have a player on the active roster! Though I did have to delve into the 40 man roster for five teams. 19 teams have at least one former BoSox on their active roster! Here’s the question: Can you name the six Red-Soxless teams?

More Sports: This just in: Jason “The Huge Headed Cheater” Giambi has torn cartilage in his left foot and will not play in the upcoming series against the Red Sox! Looks like it’ll be more of a fair fight now. HGHers playing: 0. HGHers injured: 1. (I won’t mention the, now multiple, cheater A-Rod, who was caught cheating in 2004 when he slapped the ball from Bronson’s glove and is now denying that he cheated by saying “Got it” as he passed between Toronto’s shortstop and third baseman who was attempting to make a routine catch on an infield pop up that would have ended the inning for the Yanks, preventing Matsui from scoring. Mind you it was the shortstop who went after him and had to be restrained, not the man who was called off the ball. Providing some credence that A-Rod actually said something. The third baseman wouldn’t have known who called him off, but the shortstop would have know that he didn’t say anything and heard someone else call for the ball! But I won’t mention that...)

Movies: I recently viewed the animated movie “Happy Feet.” I would say that this motion picture had some hidden agendas if they weren’t so blatantly obvious! Where do I start? The most apparent are the greenie tree hugging themes and the bull-horned anti-religion message. Mumbles, the main character, learned that the penguins shortage of fish was due to large “alien” (human) fishing vessels. He attempted to make the aliens aware of the penguins plight and was “Angered at their indifference.” Puh-Leez! Yes, yes, let’s stop fishing so the penguins can eat. Let’s stop feeding the humans so the animals can live. (Sound familiar?) He goes back to the Elders to let them know of his findings and to offer a solution. The Elders treat him as an outsider (because he dances rather than sings) and say that they must keep faith in their penguin “god” to save them. The lead Elder (Not coincidentally named Noah) shouts, “We must hold fast to our ways!” The underlying continuation of that sentence is that the end result of such a dogmatic stance is starvation. Therefore: Faith = Death. A few lesser emphasized themes were pro-illegal immigration and pro-homosexuality. Before I get a hundred comments saying that I’m reading too much into this; I admit, these are a bit of a stretch but they fall in line with the other viewpoints put forth by the movie makers (this is in no way a “film.”) I’ll support both with various plot points. Homosexuality: Mumbles can’t sing. He’s different. He’s not like the other penguins. So much so that his father basically disowns him (until his dancing saves the penguins, of course). What other type of “difference” are modern parents disowning their children for? I can only think of one... As if to highlight the fact that they had a sexual message, the animators chose to put the two main characters in three blatantly sexual positions as they “tumbled” out of the ocean onto an ice flow. All three position, by the way, could have been formed by either opposite or same sex couples. Illegal Immigration: Mumbles (an emperor penguin) meets up with other penguins (Rockhopper penguins) who accept him for who he is. He brings them to his colony. The colony immediately demands that the Rockhopper Penguins are not wanted and they need to go back where they came from. Oh, did I mention that the Rock penguins all have (again, not coincidentally) Hispanic accents? There was outrage over Jar Jar Binks and the “minority” hyenas from Lion King but this stereo-type manages to slip past those who love to be outraged? Maybe it’s because they like what they were hearing. I can think of no other reason other than a pro-illegal immigrant stance that would make the obvious racism suddenly vanish. (One more thing. Hollywood again promotes the one “ism” it believes in. Coming soon, the completely original “Surf’s Up.” An animated movie about penguins!)

More Movies: The Fantastic Four: The Rise of the Silver Surfer opens soon. I truly hope that I hear the same critique of this movie that Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace received. You see, I heard countless people complain that they like their heroes to be out numbered. The problem they had with SWEITPM was that there were two Jedi against one Sith. This small point was enough for them to discount the entire movie. TFFTROTSS has four heroes against one villain. Not only that, but in this episode, the four heroes have interchangeable powers! At one point, at least one of the heroes has multiple powers, being stretchy and flamey at the same time! Sounds like a crappy movie to me!

Theater: The Hartford Stage in Hartford Connecticut has pioneered a brilliant theatrical experience. They are calling it the “Freeview.” During lunch, people in Hartford can catch a portion of whatever play THS is performing at that time for free. They don’t even have to purchase lunch from the theater, they can bring their own. Hurray for a big theater in a *snicker* “big” town oing a big thing for theater!

Politics: At first I was pleased, but upon a second thought I’m somewhat disappointed that Cindy Sheehan (who was the subject of one of my first posts) has announced that she’s “stepping down from the public eye.” I was glad that I wouldn’t have to hear any more of her inane banter. But then I realized that her stance truly sheds light on the hypocrisy, and honesty, of some of the people protesting the war. In her “farewell address” Ms Sheehan writes: “Goodbye, America... You are not the country that I love.” Hey, tell me something I don’t know! She continues, “I finally realized no matter how much I sacrifice, I can’t make you that country unless you want it.” It’s tough to remain a country if you hate all that the country stands for, which is what would be necessary to be the country that Ms Sheehan would love. She did finally come to the only logical conclusion of her viewpoint. She cannot refer to her son (Casey) as a hero. She wrote, “Casey did indeed die for nothing... killed by his own country which is beholden to and run by a war machine that even controls what we think.” Obviously. It’s been so successful in changing your mind. I hope the family of the former NFL Player (who played for the Cardinals and really was killed by his own country) jumps all over her for this comment! Well, Ms Sheehan, JMO will miss you. One less piece of fodder for my blog.

More Politics: Here’s one I’m just throwing out there as the best of the best when it comes to bill passing! The Dems in CT want to decrease the income tax on the non-wealthy and increase it on the wealthy (And they mean wealthy! $250,000 annually and up get the increase, below, the decrease.). Gov. Rell (R) wants to temporarily suspend the 25 cent/gallon gas tax but doesn’t see why anyone’s tax should be increased as the state has a $9 million surplus. The Dems don’t want to touch the gas tax. Rell is promising a veto of any tax increase. The Dems put Rell’s gas tax suspension on their bill. If she vetoes their plan, she vetoes her own. I sit and marvel. I don’t know how I feel. I agree with Gov., why raise taxes with a surplus? But at least the Dems are true to their word. Unlike Gore and Kerry, when they say the rich, the mean the rich! Ah, politics at their finest!

Controversy: I’m just gonna toss this out there: Many homosexuals like to say that it is genetic; they were born that way. Well, blond hair is genetic. Height is genetic. If homosexuality is genetic that means one of two things: either at least one parent of every homosexual in the world is secretly gay, or homosexuality is a genetic mutation. According to natural selection, nature would choose the mutations that better the species. If all homosexuals were true to their identity, none of them would reproduce, effectively removing the genetic mutation from the planet. Hence: Homosexuality cannot be genetic.

Outrage: On the national news today I saw a story about a woman who had HG. This is a “debilitating morning sickness” condition. Mind you, however, this is a treatable debilitating morning sickness. This woman didn’t want to be sick any more so she chose to abort the baby. You read that right. Her selfishness went so far as to put three months of illness ahead of the life of her unborn child! I think what made it harder for me to understand is that this woman was already the mother of two other children! Her husband stood beside her in this decision. How can a woman who already knows that blessing of child birth and the joy of child rearing and the unbearable love that one experiences the first time your child smiles at you, or reaches for you, or says “Mama” and knows that you’ll come running; how can that woman terminate a life because needs to care for it before it’s born? I simply do not understand!

Alright... so all of that is out of my system (And see, it wasn’t all bad stuff! It was, however, all just my opinion.

14 comments:

Tamara said...

Ok...besides not caring AT ALL about sports, I thoroughly enjoy your blog! You bring up a VERY interesting view on a bunch of interesting topics! Thanks for your blog! :)

Apu said...

Any preliminary thoughts on Heath Ledger taking on the role of the Joker in the new Batman movie? Tell me he can do the job.

Marc said...

Thanks JT. I stopped by your blog as well. Good work! Just out of curiousity, how did you locate me? I have friends who live in TN, just outside of Nashville (Hendersonville, to be exact)

Anonymous said...

ok so I reading your blog and I have to take a stab at the sox question, my guess is:
1.cubs
2.Marlins
3.Nationals
4.Pirates
5.Blue Jays
6.Mariners

anyway, very interesting to read your opinions on this site!

Anonymous said...

Um, ok. Happy Feet? Seriously? Even if everything you say is true, and it was a conspiracy on the part of the filmmakers to convey those messages, do you think the 5 -6 year old kids got the message? If not, who cares? My 8-year-old sister went to the movies to see it. She loved it. The next weekend, she went fishing with her Dad. I don't think that she's psychologically damaged by the film. She also has no idea what homosexuality is.

I can't wait to see the new Fantastic Four movie. I don't care that there are 4 superheroes against one bad guy.

Cindy Sheehan should be drafted. Or, at the very least, deported.

I am convinced that homosexuality is either a physical or psychological condition. Much like my rheumatoid arthritis. Unfortunately, the doctors haven't figured out how to test for or fix the problem.

I disagree with abortion in general and would never have one myself. The problem is, our government is unable to make laws (even if they were so inclined to do saw) that have provisions. Unfortunately, I do believe that rape victims and women carrying severely deformed babies should have the option of choosing abortion. (Which is where the provision bit comes in.)

Anonymous said...

On the subject of Happy Feet -- my daughter recently watched this -age 6 - and was totally engrossed in the "don't over-fish" theme! It totally got through to her and, along with other environmentalist issues suggested through the school (aka reduce, reuse, recycle)my darling daughter is going earthy-crunchy right before my eyes! I'm totally anticipating the day she announces she's a vegetarian. Yesterday she went to an IMAX movie at the aquarium with my parents and couldn't wait to tell me how wonderful sharks are because of where they fit in the eco-system and how helpful they are to other fish!

My point -- I. for one, would have certainly appreciated if Happy Feet had been, I don't know, more about happiness and feet and less about political agendas!

~ Lynn-nore

jason said...

what is the purpose of film and theater and books? They tell stories and world views of their creators shine through them don't they. This isn't a new phenomena by any stretch is it. Artists and creative people are often in the forefront of cultural change and push the boundaries of thinking and values. Often these progressions can be wrong but not all of them are necessarily bad. I think you are making way too much about the homosexual imagery in Happy feet (aren't the characters male and female that are in love). As far as positions go while the sexualizing images for children is inappropriate if that is what they are doing do you know how penguins are involved in procreation activities (what position do they do it in)? If they showed dogs in certain natural positions would you say that is homosexually driven.

What is wrong with being more environmentally conscious and knowing the important place that sharks play in the eco-system. I agree that animals are more important than humans is ridiculous but what about stewardship and caring for God's creation as he would care for it. Dominion and rule isn't the same as domination and exploitation or abuse and extinction.

Anonymous said...

Hi Jason,

I don't mind that Kara is learning about the eco-system, and certainly an aquarium is a learning experience so it is good that she learned the proper ecological role of sharks in their natural habitats, I just agree with Marc in that it gets annoying when children's programming has such obvious "hidden" agendas. Its one thing for Kara to learn about such things at an aquarium, but when you are meaning to watch something for entertainment and get a social/political agenda instead, it just seems to intentionally shove issues into the minds of impressionable children. My point with Kara is that she WAS impressed upon by her school (re: recyclying and the associated environmental issues), DID get the fishing message from Happy Feet, and DID understand the IMAX movie. She seems like a perfect example of a child who is soaking up "agendas" like a little sponge and it makes Thom and I have to take yet another step back and make sure that the programs she is exposed to have messages we want her to receive.

Its just unfortunate that you can't trust a movie to be simple and enjoyable without the accompanying agendas anymore.

You want a real rant, ask me my first impression on Finding Nemo! It's super funny but FILLED with agendas from start to finish, though admittedly they are better disguised than Happy Feet.

~Lynn-nore

mindful mama said...

OK, why don't we avoid the whole political agenda in children's movies, etc and pull the plug? If parents are not only watching such movies, but actually bringing their children to stare at them on a screen for an hour and a half before they themselves have 'screened' them for appropriate content that falls in line with their political beliefs, then I'm not sympathetic.

Why not just avoid the commercialization of our children from the get-go and stop letting the media market political agendas to them? There is an organization called Campaign for a Commercial Free Childhood
http://www.commercialexploitation.org/
and I absolutely applaud it. My children do not watch TV. No, they don't know who Dora is, or whoever else they are 'supposed' to know about to be 'normal' American kids. If parents are intent on using media for educational purposes, they should not be surprised that the content clashes with their own beliefs when they have not prescreened such movies themselves. And furthermore, think of where this stuff is being churned out of...Hollywood. Need I say more?

And let's not forget the big bucks marketing to our children of so-called food like children's sugar laden, genetically modified cereals. This undermining of basic health and nutrition is far more terrifying than even children's tv/movies! I've worked in one of the top multinational companies and they are marketing dead 'food' to children, and parents for the most part don't even question it. Shame on the marketing geniuses for targeting children, whether in a movie or in their breakfast cereal. And a bigger shame on parents for letting them get away with it and not exercising our God-given authority to raise our children without letting our consumeristic money-driven culture do it for us.

Unknown said...

Marc --
This is waaaay off the current debate of political agenda's in children's cartoons(which is interesting! I'm hoping someone who has children responds to 2-10s comments) but I can't resist posting it, in light of a previous post you had about Brady Vs Manning. ESPN (your employer??) is doing a series of "the best" in football. I think they started out with the QB. Check it out here:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2885497

It seems many people think that it is Manning who is the overall best. What do you have to say to that?

Happy reading!

Jenna

Anonymous said...

Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Not all media for kids is bad. I actually find Dora and Blues Clues to actually be educationally fit programing. I do not object to my children watching such things because these programs really are the teaching tools they are marketed to be. It's not the cool factor - but the fun/entertainment/education that I find appropriate. Kara (now age 7) has peers who watch shows on Disney channel intended for pre-teens and discussing teen issues (shows like Hannah Montana and The Cheetah Girls). I don't think these are age appropriate for my child at this point in time, but some children's programming does help to reinforce values we are teaching.

As a parent my objection to Happy Feet isn't a question of whether or not it is appropriate for my child -- it's more a question of whether its necessary for ANY child. Elementary age children have real issues they deal with including fears and moral choices (lying, cheating, teasing, etc.) that are very real to them -- programs that deal with over-fishing and homosexuality are a waste of media money on the young and serve only to indoctrinate them into a certain worldview. My only wish is that the programming for that age group would consistently address issues relevent to that age group, and it wouldn't have to be Christian-based to do so. I, personally, believe that J.K. Rowling has done an excellent job as a non-Christian weaving legitimate moral issues of adolescence into her stories. Everything from the fear of public speaking to boy-girl issues and how they affect best-friends are dealt with appropriately despite the fact that we don't see eye-to-eye on religious issues.

So, again, I just wish Happy Feet had been more appropriate for the age for which it was marketed with less political and social overtones and more relevent content.

Lynn-nore

Unknown said...

Lynn-nore,

I don't quite understand why you are so upset about Kara learning about environmental issues. What, really, is so bad about her learning (even from a hollywood movie)that fish are being over fished, or that she should reduce-reuse-recycle. I started learning about that stuff when I was in Elementary School, and I think I turned out all right. I realize that environmental issues are the hot topic right now, and that people might be going at it on an extreem basis, BUT - things are fairly desperate, and what's wrong with your daughter learning the benefit of recycling her piece of paper or whatever?

I'm really very surprised that you like Harry Potter given your stance on Happy Feet and Finding Nemo (which I would love to hear some day, by the way). I, too, happen to Love the harry potter books, but don't you think it is ultimately teaching children about witch craft and sorcery and all things evil? Yes, there are relationship issues, and fear and all that other stuff...but it seems you neglected to point out the obvious "dark arts" that are blantantly in it. How can you think that THAT is okay, but think that the homosexuality (which, too me is a HUGE stretch) that is in Happy Feet is not? Besides, isn't witch craft "worse" than homosexuality since it is basically worshipping Satan? Plenty of homosexuals still love God, but I doubt there are too many people who are into witch craft or sorcery, etc that do!

Now, of course, we can debate the homosexual issue for a long time and never come to any concrete conclusion. So, let's not start.

I don't have children, so I can't completely understand the issues surrounding the tv/movie problem. I hope, tho, that if/when I have children that they do NOT watch tv. My sis-in-law, who has three, only allows them to watch one, pre-screened, pre-approved video a week as a "treat" otherwise they're busy doing activities -- school, ballet, trips to the park, beach (They live in CA) etc. I know that for me, I can get easily sucked into one tv show after another, and I wouldn't want that to happen to my kids when they could be reading, being in positive activites, perhaps recycling :P etc there's just too much out there in the world to spend time watching tv.

I think of the people I know who didn't watch tv when they were kids. They're almost always the people who (now as adults) are extreemly active, smart, involved in a hundred things. I wish I were like that! And I want my kids to be like that.

Ok, i'm sorry! This is way too long. And you've moved onto Marc's next post. But still, I would love to see your response/thoughts to this...

Thanks for reading!

Jenna

Anonymous said...

Out of all of this, the only thing I'll bother addressing is:

"Besides, isn't witch craft "worse" than homosexuality since it is basically worshipping Satan?"

The Bible that I read says that all sins are created equal. Am I reading the wrong book?

Marc said...

ok, my turn. My issue is that little children accept without question. As adults we can decipher (and need to decipher for our kids) the messages that are appropriate and those that aren't. Most parents do not do this. While I have no simpathy for those parents, I do have simpathy for the children who are being indoctrinated because they have irrisponsible parents. This is the same complaint I have with Harry Potter: because parents don't screen what they give to their children, it was irresponisible for Rowling to write a series that starts out for 10 year olds and is now for 17 year olds. Parents of current 10 year olds won't make thier kids wait to read the seventh book even though it was not written for them.

There is nothing wrong with little Kara learning about reduce, reuse, recycle. It simply drives home the point that even at 6, she got it. She picked up the message. What else are children picking up from these movies? And, more frightening, what are they picking up that even they don't realize they've absorbed?

Jenna: that story is such a joke. It's just like Hollywood: you are only as good as your last movie (or in this case: season). Brady destroys Manning in over-all post season numbers. Manning is surrounded with Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark. Brady's got wide receivers that no one ever heard of until they started catching Brady TD passes. If Manning and Brady switched teams the Patriots would be a five hundred team and the Colts would be the dynasty. These so called commentators have obviously not checked the numbers recently. Their lack of knowledge and apparent loss of long term memory makes them irrelevant. Now that Brady has Moss to toss to the debate will finally come to a conclusion.

By the way, here's the answer:
1: Cardinals
2: Mariners
3: White Sox
4: Nationals
5: Twins
6: Rockies